Actually, no. We aren’t Mizzou at all.
Volume 3 of the EJSICleaks is ready for leakage (that doesn’t sound right, but I’m sticking to it).
Today’s lone leak is a series of e-mails between Ole Miss and the Southeastern Conference discovered by two loyal readers: j-town-hero and daparish.
Hey guys, remember that time we helped you move back in ’69? Yeah, we’re going to need a favor. Please don’t let Memphis into the SEC! It’s hard enough to get people to play sports here as it is! I mean, come on, our mascot is Rebel Black Bear. WTF is that? Do you know how damn hard it is to tell athletes that they could one day wear that “Rebel Black Bear” uniform with pride? It’s embarrassing. And now you want us to compete with Memphis for recruits too? COME ON!
Subject: RE: Hey!
We understand your concern about a new admittance into the SEC with whom you would directly compete as a bottom-rung SEC team. However, the predicament with your new “Black Bear” mascot is a crisis that the SEC attempted to avert. As we related to you in the weeks prior to your mascot selection, the only subspecies of black bear present in Mississippi is the LOUISIANA black bear (Ursa Americanus Luteolus). However, in its infinite “wisdom”, your administration disregarded our warning and named your mascot after a namesake species of one of your most hated rivals, Louisiana State University. It’s only fitting, however, that your mascot would be an homage to the football program that has been stamping it’s name on you for nearly 100 years now. FWIW, we were pulling for Admiral Ackbar.
It’s Not a Trap,
the Southeastern Conference
Subject: RE: Hey!
I, personally, nor any of the coaching staff at Ole Miss was actually given a vote. Unfortunately the student body was too busy with their studies and what not to actually research the Miss. black bear population prior to making the decision and I’m told that the Rebel Black Bear was fairly popular with the ladies because it was “cuddly”. How am I supposed to work with cuddly? For the record, I was pulling for the Rebel Lion. Get it? Makes me chuckle every time.
-Ole Miss Coaching Staff
This topic has consumed about 70% of my sports related attention this month and Expansion Hoopla V1.0 got a lot of hits, so let’s do it again…
A lot has changed in a week (actually not really; the only thing that has changed is my mind). This super-long post lacks pictures or graphics and is broken down into several text-heavy sections. If you just want to bitch about the conference or the Pod I put your school in, scroll to the bottom and comment. If you are a conference expansion junkie like me, sit back and enjoy my rambling inferences and analysis.
The first part of this post explains what I have inferred based on recent comments from relevant conference commissioners, university Presidents, AD’s, and insiders.
-Maryland and North Carolina have likely both told the Big Ten to pound sand. They like the ACC for now.
-Texas probably isn’t going to the Big Ten either. They are more interested in merging the cream of the crop from the Big Twelve with the Pac-10, possibly as a simple six team addition to form the Pac-16 and possibly as a “Western Alliance” with a looser conference connection and as many as 24 schools.
-Nebraska and Missouri are dying to be invited to the Big Ten. Even Tom Osbourne issued a statement saying as much. Both schools’ Presidents are already on record as being very interested.
-Oklahoma and Oklahoma State want an SEC invite. They might get invited to the Pac-16 with Texas or they might not. They prefer the certainty and immediate prestige the SEC brings.
-Kansas is on the fence between the Big Ten and the Texas led Pac-16. Either way, they’ll probably be in a better position than they are now. There is a slim chance that they could end up homeless if the Big Ten invites Missouri and Nebraska and the Pac-10 and Texas don’t invite them to be one of the five teams to join the Pac-16.
-Utah is probably going to the Pac-10 / Pac-12 / Pac-16 regardless of what else happens.
-Boise State to the MWC is a done deal. Makes sense for all parties and the MWC will need someone to replace Utah if they leave for the Pac-10 or BYU if they leave for the Western Alliance. Expect this announcement in June.
-Rutgers to the Big Ten is a done deal. Paul Taglibue’s disparaging comments about the potential Long Island television audience for a Rutgers-Minnesota game reek of bitterness. If this announcement is made in June then Rutgers will be able to play Big Ten football in 2012.
-Pittsburgh, Syracuse, and Connecticut would all love a Big Ten invite. Each has serious drawbacks, but each brings added East Coast viewers. Pitt’s drawback is that is brings the fewest viewers since Penn State already owns the Pennsylvania market. Syracuse’s problem is that they are a medium sized private school that doesn’t do much research and has a horrible football stadium. Connecticut is not a member of the AAU and Continue reading
In December, the Big Ten conference (the bestest and richest athletic conference in the galaxy) announced that it is studying the idea of expanding. The Big Ten did not announce whether it is thinking about expanding by one team (preferably Notre Dame) or whether it might pull a Big East or a WAC and create a superconference of up to 16 schools. This stuff fascinates me, and I have been reading expansion plans from bloggers and columnists all over the internets for the past four months. The following are two proposals with a sliver of realism that I would really enjoy:
-Notre Dame stupidly turns down the Big Ten yet again.
-Big Ten grabs Texas.
-Big Twelve starts to panic, as Texas is responsible for 40% of the already crappy TV contract.
-Colorado bolts for the Pac-10, which also takes Utah from the Mountain West.
-Big Twelve counters by poaching TCU and BYU from Mountain West.
-Mountain West is now on its heels, having lost its top three programs.
-WAC steps in and invites New Mexico, UNLV, and San Diego State.
-They accept and the Mountain West folds, leaving Wyoming, Colorado State, and Air Force homeless.
-The Big East is now the only major conference without 12 teams, and the new WAC is looking stronger. Notre Dame is also feeling the heat.
-Big East pressures Notre Dame into joining for football and invites Memphis, Central Florida, and Temple for football and basketball.
-CUSA is now two teams short, so it steals Louisiana Tech from the WAC and Middle Tennessee State from the Sun Belt.
-The WAC picks up Wyoming to get back to 12 teams and the Sun Belt Continue reading
The current set-up in college sports that you and I grew up with is soon to be a thing of the past. We will look back upon them with fond memories and a little drool on our chins, saying, “Back in my day…” College athletics are set to undergo a radical transformation.
It will begin with the two biggest sports: football and basketball. For much of the now departed college basketball season, rumor swirled of the NCAA’s impending opt-out. In other words, they can void the current contract with CBS and put the men’s tournament on the open market for the highest bidder. But with the new TV deal will likely come an expansion of the tournament from its current 65 team format to a 96 one, eliminating the National Invitational Tournament in the process.
The big money in college athletics is on the gridiron. The basketball change may leave some ripples across the land, but a major shake-up in football will affect all other collegiate sports. The rumor mill began last year when the Big Ten, the NCAA’s richest conference, publicly stated its desire to add at least one new member. In doing so, the Big Ten would have twelve members and would be able to play that all important conference championship game.
However, the Big Ten may be looking to add more than one team. Tony Barnhart, aka Mr. College Football, of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution wrote in a recent blog post, “The Big Ten is looking at three plans: Stand pat with 11 teams, add one team (hopefully Notre Dame) or make a blockbuster move and go to 16.”
It seems unlikely at this point that the Big Ten would not expand. They’ve announced intentions to do so which would lead us all to believe they will follow through with those plans. Adding one team would give them the minimum number to have the coveted championship game. And every one loves to say Notre Dame is the obvious choice because they are. But the Irish have been reluctant to join in the past. This is what leads many, including me, to believe that a “superconference” is in the making.
A superconference of 16 teams forces Notre Dame to join. Irish Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick even admitted so at a press conference for the Big East basketball tournament (of which Notre Dame is a member): “The college landscape is as unstable as I’ve seen it… You could each invent a scenario that would force our hand.” He went on to say that Notre Dame would like to maintain its football independence.
But the question is, can they? With the possible realignment of 16 teams in the Big Ten, Notre Dame would have to join out of necessity. For one, adding five teams most likely means at least one and probably more Big East teams would be absorbed. Frank the Tank, a blogger who writes about Chicago and University of Illinois sports as well as other topics, states that “Syracuse and Rutgers (along with the Irish) are virtual locks” for a 16 team Big Ten. Both universities bring the New York City market with them which is one market the Big Ten has yet to fully penetrate (especially with the Big Ten Network television channel).
And if the Big East is torn apart (again), that leaves the question of automatic bids to the NCAA tourney and a BCS bid in football. Notre Dame is basically given a BCS bid without conference affiliation as long as they finish in the top 12 of the standings. But it could still force their hand in other sports. And we cannot discount the possibility of a change in the BCS format if the rest of college athletics transforms. I do not specifically mean a playoff, but it is logical to think that a seismic shift in conferences could result in changes to the current format.
Frank the Tank goes on to look at possible Big Ten candidates sans the three locks mentioned earlier. One such scenario involves bringing in Maryland and Boston College to “capture the entire Northeast, while, at least on paper, adding New York, Boston, and Washington markets.” Another possibility is to get Nebraska and Kansas from the Big XII which adds a basketball and a football power for balance as well as adding new markets. Finally, Frank writes Texas and Texas A&M could come together as a political package (one couldn’t go without the other).
While I am not willing to discuss every possibility, it seems logical one of these three moves is going to happen. But whatever the Big Ten does, it will force the other conferences to react. The SEC stands next to the Big Ten in terms of economic superiority. Do they expand as well? If the Big XII, ACC, or Big East is ransacked, what becomes of those conferences and their automatic bids? Does the Pac 10 answer?
It is clear that a revolution in college athletics is in the immediate future, possibly as early as the 2012 football season if the decisions are made soon. At this point, the Big Ten holds the key to everything. They could add only one team and the landscape would probably remain similar to how it is. Or they could make a tidal wave and transform college athletics to something we’ve never seen before. Eventually, the superconferences will come to fruition, so why not start now?
First, stop emphasizing the word “the” in your official name. No one cares. However, that is not the subject of my letter. I am writing on behalf of the college basketball world today. Why? Why did you have to chuck countless threes in the last 10 minutes of the second half?
I know Tennessee had an advantage on the inside, but did you have to rim out on all of them? It used to be so fun holding the banner of “Sweet Sixteen U” over Tennessee fans, but no more. I imagined a university that holds itself in such high regard could keep the history alive, but I was mistaken.
So thanks, Ohio State, for reminding me why I never choose your athletic teams to win a big game. Was the SEC speed too much for you this time as well?
For college sports fans with teams who suck, it seems the default mechanism nowadays is to champion the strength of your conference to make yourself feel better about said suckage. We’ve all had conversations with Big East conference homers in basketball and SEC conference homers in football (I’m pretty sure I am one).
Every year the Big Dance acts as the rule that the conferences are measured against. Whoever dominates the tournament has bragging rights for the year.
So… How do the conferences stand up after round one? Have a look below:
- Big East – 4 of 8 teams remain = 50%
- Big 12 – 5 of 7 teams remain = 71%
- ACC – 4 of 6 teams remain = 67%
- Big 10 – 4 of 5 teams remain = 80%
- SEC – 2 of 4 teams remain = 50%
- Pac 10 – 2 of 2 teams remain =100%
- Mid-Majors – 11 of 33 teams remain = 33%
Obviously of note in that comparison should be the relative success of the Big 12, ACC, and Big 10 versus the relative failure of the Big East and SEC. The fact that the Pac 10 won both of their games is commendable, considering how terrible that conference looked all year. Also noteworthy is the fact that 11 mid-major teams are still alive after the first weekend.
These numbers alone don’t tell you that much in the grand scheme of things. What’s really interesting is looking at how the conferences have performed in terms of seeding. To analyze this, I’ve listed the number of teams that have performed at or below their seeding for each conference.
- Big East – 5 teams performed at or above their seed, while 3 teams played below their seeding. 0 teams performed above their seeding.
- Big 12 – 5 teams performed at or above their seed, while 2 teams played below their seeding. 1 team performed above their seeding.
- ACC - 5 teams performed at or above their seed, while 1 team played below their seeding. 1 team performed above their seeding.
- Big 10 – All 5 teams performed at or above their seed. 0 teams performed above their seeding.
- SEC – 4 teams performed at or above their seed, while 1 team played below their seeding. 0 teams performed above their seeding.
- Pac 10 – 2 teams performed at or above their seed, while 0 teams played below their seeding. 1 team performed above their seeding.
- Mid-Majors – 30 teams performed at or above their seed, while 3 teams played below their seeding. 6 teams performed above their seeding.
This is where it gets a little more interesting. With 3 teams playing below their seeding and 0 teams performing above their seeding, it’s safe to say that the Big East has under-achieved compared to the other conferences. The Big 12 had 2 teams perform below their seeding, but they also had one perform above their seeding.The other major conferences performed as you would probably expect.
Obviously, the big winner in all this is the Mid-Major fan. 30 of 33 teams played at or above their seeding, while only 3 performed below their seeding. In fact, the three teams that performed below their seeding actually lost to other mid-major teams. An impressive 6 teams performed above their seeding.
What have we learned from all this? Getting the most teams in doesn’t necessarily mean you have the best conference in terms of quality. Not this year at least…
Well, we’ve reached the conclusion to the 2010 edition of the SEC tournament, and Kentucky fans will have something to smile about as they sit in traffic on I-65 north this afternoon.
Though the win can partly be attributed to the willingness of Mississippi State to be careless with the ball late in regulation, it took a couple of amazing plays by the Cats to seal the deal. The biggest of which being John Wall’s ridiculously tough 3 pointer late in overtime to make it a 4 point lead, and essentially sealing Miss St’s fate.
But there was more, and here are a couple of other tidbits from my view in the stands: